Literature Studies
Page summary |
---|
Here outcomes of benchmarking studies from the literature are collected. The primary aim is a comprehensive overview about neutral benchmark studies, i.e. assessments which were performed independenty on publication of a new approach. Studies which are not neutral are put in brackets. The focus is on computational methods for analyzing experimental data (instead of comparing experimental techniques or platforms). Please extend this list by creating a new page and adding a link below. |
Contents
1 Results from Literature
1.1 Classification
2003
2005
2016
1.2 Selection of Differential Features and Regions
1.2.1 Identifying differential features
2006
2010
2017
- Identification of differentially expressed peptides in high-throughput proteomics data
- In-depth method assessments of differentially expressed protein detection for shotgun proteomics data with missing values
- Strategies for analyzing bisulfite sequencing data
2018
1.2.2 Identifying differential regions (e.g. DMRs)
1.2.3 Identifying sets of features (e.g. gene set analyses)
2009
- A general modular framework for gene set enrichment analysis
- Comparing gene set analysis methods on single-nucleotide polymorphism data from Genetic Analysis Workshop 16
2018
2020
1.2.4 Dimension reduction
Year | First Author | Title |
---|---|---|
2008 | Janecek | On the Relationship Between Feature Selection and Classification Accuracy |
2015 | Fernández-Gutiérrez | Comparing feature selection methods for highdimensional imbalanced data: identifying rheumatoid arthritis cohorts from routine data |