Literature Studies
Page summary |
---|
Here outcomes of benchmarking studies from the literature are collected. The primary aim is a comprehensive overview about neutral benchmark studies, i.e. assessments which were performed independenty on publication of a new approach. Studies which are not neutral are put in brackets. The focus is on computational methods for analyzing experimental data form the molecular biology field (instead of comparing experimental techniques or platforms). Please extend this list by creating a new page and adding a link below. |
Contents
1 Results from Literature
1.1 Classification
Year | First Author | Title |
---|---|---|
2003 | Wu | Comparison of statistical methods for classification of ovarian cancer using mass spectrometry data |
2005 | Bellaachia | Predicting Breast Cancer Survivability Using Data Mining Techniques |
1.2 Selection of Differential Features and Regions
1.2.1 Identifying differential features
1.2.2 Identifying differential regions (e.g. DMRs)
1.2.3 Identifying sets of features (e.g. gene set analyses)
Year | First Author | Title |
---|---|---|
2009 | Ackermann | A general modular framework for gene set enrichment analysis |
2009 | Tintle | Comparing gene set analysis methods on single-nucleotide polymorphism data from Genetic Analysis Workshop 16 |
2018 | Mathur | Gene set analysis methods: a systematic comparison |
2020 | Geistlinger | Toward a gold standard for benchmarking gene set enrichment analysis |
1.2.4 Dimension reduction
Year | First Author | Title |
---|---|---|
2008 | Janecek | On the Relationship Between Feature Selection and Classification Accuracy |
2015 | Fernández-Gutiérrez | Comparing feature selection methods for highdimensional imbalanced data: identifying rheumatoid arthritis cohorts from routine data |
1.3 Preprocessing high-throughput data
1.4 Imputation methods for missing values
1.5 Omics Workflows