Comparison of peak‐picking workflows for untargeted liquid chromatography/high‐resolution mass spectrometry metabolomics data analysis

1 Citation

Rafiei A, Sleno L. Comparison of peak‐picking workflows for untargeted liquid chromatography/high‐resolution mass spectrometry metabolomics data analysis. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 2015 Jan 15;29(1):119-27.

Permanent link to the paper

2 Summary

Briefly describe the scope of the paper, i.e. the field of research and/or application.

3 Study outcomes

List the paper results concerning method comparison and benchmarking:

3.1 Outcome O1

The performance of ...

Outcome O1 is presented as Figure X in the original publication.

3.2 Outcome O2

...

Outcome O2 is presented as Figure X in the original publication.

3.3 Outcome On

...

Outcome On is presented as Figure X in the original publication.

3.4 Further outcomes

If intended, you can add further outcomes here.

4 Study design and evidence level

4.1 General aspects

You can describe general design aspects here. The study designs for describing specific outcomes are listed in the following subsections:

4.2 Design for Outcome O1

• The outcome was generated for ...
• Configuration parameters were chosen ...
• ...

4.3 Design for Outcome O2

• The outcome was generated for ...
• Configuration parameters were chosen ...
• ...

...

4.4 Design for Outcome O

• The outcome was generated for ...
• Configuration parameters were chosen ...
• ...

6 References

The list of cited or related literature is placed here.