Difference between revisions of "Literature Studies"
(→Microbiome) |
(→Microbiome) |
||
Line 299: | Line 299: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2016 || D’Amore R || [[A comprehensive benchmarking study of protocols and sequencing platforms for 16S rRNA community profiling]] | | 2016 || D’Amore R || [[A comprehensive benchmarking study of protocols and sequencing platforms for 16S rRNA community profiling]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2016 || Bokulich N || [[mockrobiota: a public resource for microbiome bioinformatics benchmarking]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2017 || McIntyre AB || [[Comprehensive benchmarking and ensemble approaches for metagenomic classifiers]] | | 2017 || McIntyre AB || [[Comprehensive benchmarking and ensemble approaches for metagenomic classifiers]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2018 || Nearing JT || [[Denoising the Denoisers: an independent evaluation of microbiome sequence error-correction approaches]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2019 || Ye S || [[Benchmarking Metagenomics Tools for Taxonomic Classification]] | | 2019 || Ye S || [[Benchmarking Metagenomics Tools for Taxonomic Classification]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2020 || Wang XW || [[Comparative study of classifiers for human microbiome data]] | | 2020 || Wang XW || [[Comparative study of classifiers for human microbiome data]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2020 || Calgaro M || [[Assessment of statistical methods from single cell, bulk RNA-seq, and metagenomics applied to microbiome data]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2020 || Seppey M || [[LEMMI: a continuous benchmarking platform for metagenomics classifiers]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2021 || Kubinski R || [[Benchmark of data processing methods and machine learning models for gut microbiome-based diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease]] | | 2021 || Kubinski R || [[Benchmark of data processing methods and machine learning models for gut microbiome-based diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2021 || Lloréns-Rico V || [[Benchmarking microbiome transformations favors experimental quantitative approaches to address compositionality and sampling depth biases]] | | 2021 || Lloréns-Rico V || [[Benchmarking microbiome transformations favors experimental quantitative approaches to address compositionality and sampling depth biases]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2021 || Andreu-Sánchez S || [[A benchmark of genetic variant calling pipelines using metagenomic short-read sequencing]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2021 || Cho H || [[Distribution-based comprehensive evaluation of methods for differential expression analysis in metatranscriptomics]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2021 || Parks DH || [[Evaluation of the microba community profiler for taxonomic profiling of metagenomic datasets from the human gut microbiome]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2021 || Dixit K || [[Benchmarking of 16S rRNA gene databases using known strain sequences]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2021 || Khomich M || [[Analysing microbiome intervention design studies: Comparison of alternative multivariate statistical methods]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2022 || Nearing J || [[Microbiome differential abundance methods produce different results across 38 datasets]] | | 2022 || Nearing J || [[Microbiome differential abundance methods produce different results across 38 datasets]] |
Revision as of 15:47, 18 February 2022
Page summary |
---|
Here outcomes of benchmarking studies from the literature are collected. The primary aim is a comprehensive overview about neutral benchmark studies, i.e. assessments which were performed independenty on publication of a new approach. Studies which are not neutral are put in brackets. The focus is on computational methods for analyzing experimental data form the molecular biology field (instead of comparing experimental techniques or platforms). Please extend this list by creating a new page and adding a link below. |
Contents
1 Results from Literature
https://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/biology/issues/biy-21-45-2/biy-45-2-1-2008-8.pdf
1.1 Preprocessing high-throughput data
1.2 Imputation methods for missing values
1.3 Selection of Differential Features and Regions
1.3.1 Identifying differential features
1.3.2 Identifying differential regions (e.g. DMRs)
1.3.3 Identifying sets of features (e.g. gene set analyses)
Year | First Author | Title |
---|---|---|
2009 | Ackermann | A general modular framework for gene set enrichment analysis |
2009 | Tintle | Comparing gene set analysis methods on single-nucleotide polymorphism data from Genetic Analysis Workshop 16 |
2018 | Mathur | Gene set analysis methods: a systematic comparison |
2020 | Geistlinger | Toward a gold standard for benchmarking gene set enrichment analysis |
1.3.4 Dimension reduction
Year | First Author | Title |
---|---|---|
2008 | Janecek | On the Relationship Between Feature Selection and Classification Accuracy |
2015 | Fernández-Gutiérrez | Comparing feature selection methods for highdimensional imbalanced data: identifying rheumatoid arthritis cohorts from routine data |
1.4 Classification
Year | First Author | Title |
---|---|---|
2003 | Wu | Comparison of statistical methods for classification of ovarian cancer using mass spectrometry data |
2005 | Bellaachia | Predicting Breast Cancer Survivability Using Data Mining Techniques |
1.5 Omics Workflows
1.6 Microbiome
1.7 ODE-based Modelling
1.8 Other Studies
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00521-021-06188-z
https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1568674/FULLTEXT01.pdf
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405471221002076
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15476286.2021.1940047