Difference between revisions of "Literature Studies"
(→Dimension reduction) |
(→Identifying differential regions (e.g. DMRs)) |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
==== Identifying differential regions (e.g. DMRs) ==== | ==== Identifying differential regions (e.g. DMRs) ==== | ||
− | + | {| class="wikitable sortable" | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | ! 2015 || First Author || [[De novo identification of differentially methylated regions in the human genome]] | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | | 2015 || First Author || [[MethylAction: detecting differentially methylated regions that distinguish biological subtypes]] | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | | 2015 || First Author || [[metilene: Fast and sensitive calling of differentially methylated regions from bisulfite sequencing data]] | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | | 2016 || First Author || [[seqlm: an MDL based method for identifying differentially methylated regions in high density methylation array data]] | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | | 2016 || First Author || [[Statistical methods for detecting differentially methylated regions based on MethylCap-seq data]] | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | | 2017 || First Author || [[DMRfinder: efficiently identifying differentially methylated regions from MethylC-seq data]] | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2018 || First Author || [[Defiant: (DMRs: easy, fast, identification and ANnoTation) identifies differentially Methylated regions from iron-deficient rat hippocampus]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2018 || First Author || [[DMRcaller: a versatile R/Bioconductor package for detection and visualization of differentially methylated regions in CpG and non-CpG contexts]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2018 || First Author || [[MethCP: Differentially Methylated Region Detection with Change Point Models (bioRxiv)]] | ||
+ | |} | ||
==== Identifying sets of features (e.g. gene set analyses) ==== | ==== Identifying sets of features (e.g. gene set analyses) ==== |
Revision as of 16:02, 28 February 2020
Page summary |
---|
Here outcomes of benchmarking studies from the literature are collected. The primary aim is a comprehensive overview about neutral benchmark studies, i.e. assessments which were performed independenty on publication of a new approach. Studies which are not neutral are put in brackets. The focus is on computational methods for analyzing experimental data (instead of comparing experimental techniques or platforms). Please extend this list by creating a new page and adding a link below. |
Contents
1 Results from Literature
1.1 Classification
2003
2005
2016
1.2 Selection of Differential Features and Regions
1.2.1 Identifying differential features
2006
2010
2017
- Identification of differentially expressed peptides in high-throughput proteomics data
- In-depth method assessments of differentially expressed protein detection for shotgun proteomics data with missing values
- Strategies for analyzing bisulfite sequencing data
2018
1.2.2 Identifying differential regions (e.g. DMRs)
1.2.3 Identifying sets of features (e.g. gene set analyses)
2009
- A general modular framework for gene set enrichment analysis
- Comparing gene set analysis methods on single-nucleotide polymorphism data from Genetic Analysis Workshop 16
2018
2020
1.2.4 Dimension reduction
Year | First Author | Title |
---|---|---|
2008 | First Author | On the Relationship Between Feature Selection and Classification Accuracy |
2015 | First Author | Comparing feature selection methods for highdimensional imbalanced data: identifying rheumatoid arthritis cohorts from routine data |